In a powerful show of strength and operational preparedness, Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff (COAS), General Syed Asim Munir, visited the Tilla Field Firing Ranges (TFFR) near Jhelum on Thursday, April 29, 2025, to witness “Exercise Hammer Strike” — a high-intensity, large-scale field training drill conducted by the Mangla Strike Corps, a key offensive arm of the Pakistan Army.
The timing of the exercise and the remarks delivered by General Munir carry added significance amid the recent suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) by India — a move that has sharply escalated tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. In this climate of strategic uncertainty, the Pakistan Army’s demonstration of offensive maneuver warfare and integrated firepower serves as both a deterrent and a message of resolve.
A Measured but Forceful Response
Speaking to troops at the TFFR, General Munir warned that any military misadventure by India would be met with a “swift, resolute” response. He emphasized that Pakistan’s armed forces are fully capable of defending the country’s sovereignty against all threats — overt or covert.
This statement comes on the heels of India’s unprecedented move to suspend its participation in the IWT — a landmark 1960 agreement brokered by the World Bank that governs the use of waters of the Indus River system. Pakistan has called the suspension a unilateral violation of international law and a potential act of coercion with severe consequences for regional peace.
The Pakistani military leadership appears to be viewing the treaty suspension not just as a diplomatic rift but as a potential precursor to hybrid conflict — possibly involving water warfare, escalation along the Line of Control (LoC), or provocations under the nuclear threshold.
Strategic Significance of Tilla and the “Hammer Strike”
Located near Jhelum in Punjab province, the Tilla Field Firing Ranges are a historic venue for major weapons tests and army drills. Also known as the Mashhood Test Firing Range, it has served as a testbed for missile systems such as the Ghauri and as a training ground for the army’s strike formations.
“Exercise Hammer Strike” featured extensive live-fire drills, showcasing modern VT-4 main battle tanks, SH-15 long-range artillery systems, and integrated infantry maneuvers. The emphasis on mobile warfare and combined arms integration reflects the army’s shift toward rapid response and hybrid combat preparedness — particularly essential given the geographic and tactical challenges posed by a potential eastern front with India.
General Munir lauded the professionalism and offensive spirit of the troops, underscoring that the Pakistan Army is not only vigilant to emerging threats but also fully equipped — technologically and doctrinally — to counter them.
Water as a Weapon?
The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty marks a dangerous shift in regional dynamics. For over six decades, the IWT stood as one of the rare examples of sustained cooperation between India and Pakistan, even through wars and crises. Its abrupt halt introduces an unpredictable variable into an already volatile environment.
Pakistan fears that India could weaponize water flow by building infrastructure to divert rivers, affecting agriculture, power generation, and the livelihoods of millions. In response, Pakistan’s security establishment is signaling that it considers any tampering with water rights as a strategic threat — one that could justify broader retaliatory measures, including military ones.
Deterrence Through Readiness
By holding high-visibility exercises like “Hammer Strike,” Pakistan is reaffirming a policy of deterrence-through-readiness. The army’s messaging is clear: any miscalculation by the adversary — whether diplomatic, economic, or military — will be met with proportionate, possibly escalatory, responses.
The demonstration also reassures the Pakistani public and regional allies that the country’s armed forces remain on alert and capable of protecting national interests, including vital water resources.
Certainly! Here’s an expanded section on the VT-4 tanks, which you can incorporate into your article or presentation:
VT-4 Main Battle Tanks: Backbone of Modern Armored Warfare in Pakistan
The VT-4 is a third-generation main battle tank (MBT) developed by China’s state-owned Norinco (China North Industries Corporation) and represents a significant upgrade to Pakistan’s armored capabilities. Acquired as part of Pakistan’s military modernization drive, the VT-4 combines advanced firepower, digital systems, and survivability features that position it as a key asset in Pakistan’s strategic deterrent posture.
Key Features of the VT-4:
- Firepower:
- The VT-4 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore cannon, capable of firing armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds, high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) munitions, and guided missiles.
- It features an autoloader, reducing crew size to 3 and enhancing rate of fire.
- Advanced Fire Control System:
- The tank boasts a digital fire control system with hunter-killer capability, thermal imaging sights, and laser rangefinders, allowing for high first-hit probability in day and night conditions.
- The system enables the commander and gunner to engage multiple targets independently and simultaneously — a vital feature in mobile armored warfare.
- Protection:
- The VT-4 offers modular composite armor with optional explosive reactive armor (ERA), providing strong protection against kinetic and shaped-charge threats.
- It includes a laser warning system and smoke grenade launchers to counter enemy targeting and missile lock-ons.
- Mobility:
- Powered by a 1,300 hp turbocharged diesel engine, the VT-4 can reach speeds of up to 70 km/h on the road and traverse diverse terrain.
- It features a hydropneumatic suspension system for improved stability, especially during firing on the move.
- Network-Centric Capabilities:
- The VT-4 is equipped with battlefield management systems (BMS) and communication suites that allow seamless integration with infantry and artillery units.
- It is designed for both standalone operations and formation-level maneuvers, vital for corps-level exercises like “Hammer Strike.”
Operational Role in Pakistan:
The VT-4 has begun replacing older platforms such as the T-59 and early-model T-80 tanks. It is especially suited for Pakistan’s plains warfare doctrine in Punjab and Sindh, where open terrain favors fast-moving, heavily armored units. In the context of exercises like Hammer Strike, the deployment of VT-4s underscores the Pakistan Army’s ability to mount rapid, integrated offensive operations in response to external aggression.
With Pakistan and India both fielding large armored formations, the VT-4 gives Pakistan a qualitative edge in certain operational contexts — particularly when used in conjunction with UAVs, modern artillery like the SH-15, and real-time intelligence systems.
Here’s a detailed comparison between Pakistan’s VT-4 and India’s T-90 Bhishma tanks, highlighting their strengths and implications for the strategic balance in South Asia:
VT-4 vs T-90 Bhishma: A Comparative Strategic Analysis
| Feature | VT-4 (Pakistan) | T-90 Bhishma (India) |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | China (Norinco) | Russia (Uralvagonzavod), modified by India |
| Induction | 2020s | Early 2000s (upgraded over time) |
| Crew | 3 (autoloader) | 3 (autoloader) |
| Main Armament | 125mm smoothbore gun (HEAT, APFSDS, ATGM) | 125mm smoothbore gun (HEAT, APFSDS, ATGM) |
| Missile Capability | Yes (laser-guided ATGM) | Yes (Invar missile, range ~5 km) |
| Fire Control System | Fully digital, hunter-killer capability, thermal sights | Upgraded digital system, thermal imaging, hunter-killer in newer variants |
| Night Fighting | Advanced 3rd-gen thermal sights for commander and gunner | Thermal sights; early models had night vision issues, later improved |
| Armor Protection | Modular composite + ERA; optional APS | Composite armor + Kontakt-5 ERA; no standard APS |
| Engine Power | 1,300 hp diesel engine | 1,000 hp (early), up to 1,130 hp in Bhishma |
| Speed (Road) | Up to 70 km/h | Around 60–65 km/h |
| Mobility | Strong in diverse terrain; better power-to-weight ratio | Good on plains but limited agility in high-altitude zones |
| Situational Awareness | Modern C4ISR integration, laser warning receivers, digital battlefield systems | Limited network-centric features; upgrades ongoing |
| Cost | Lower (estimated ~$5M) | Higher (est. $4.5–5M, but older design and higher maintenance) |
Strategic Implications:
1. Technology Edge:
- The VT-4, being a newer design, benefits from more modern digital systems, integrated battlefield awareness, and improved thermal optics.
- T-90 Bhishma, while numerically superior in India’s arsenal (over 1,100 units), suffers from older base architecture, though upgrades have improved its fire control and mobility.
2. Armor and Survivability:
- Both tanks use Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA), but the VT-4’s modular composite + optional Active Protection System (APS) gives it an edge in survivability against modern threats, including top-attack ATGMs and drones.
- T-90s lack a standard APS, making them more vulnerable to next-gen anti-tank systems.
3. Mobility and Power:
- The VT-4’s 1,300 hp engine offers better acceleration and cross-country performance, a crucial factor in Punjab or Cholistan theater operations.
- The T-90’s lower horsepower makes it slightly slower and less nimble, especially under full combat load.
4. Operational Doctrine:
- Pakistan’s use of VT-4s aligns with its Corps-level strike doctrine (Mangla Strike Corps), emphasizing quick offensives and combined arms synergy.
- India uses the T-90 as the backbone of its armored formations in plains warfare, with modifications for desert and border deployment.
While India holds numerical superiority in armored vehicles, Pakistan’s acquisition of VT-4 tanks narrows the qualitative gap. In the event of a short, high-intensity conflict — such as one possibly triggered by developments like the Indus Waters Treaty suspension — the VT-4’s superior electronics, protection systems, and firepower integration may allow Pakistan to achieve localized tactical superiority, especially when supported by artillery, drones, and ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) systems.
That said, India’s continued upgrades to the T-90 Bhishma, combined with its larger industrial and logistical depth, maintain a formidable deterrent. The balance remains delicate and highlights why both nations must tread carefully in times of diplomatic strain.
Conclusion
As the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty threatens to unravel decades of fragile peace mechanisms, military readiness becomes not just a matter of defense but of diplomatic signaling. “Exercise Hammer Strike” reflects Pakistan’s resolve to deter aggression and uphold its sovereign rights — including its share of the Indus waters. With tensions rising, the hope for dialogue must remain alive, but so must the credibility of deterrence.
Word Count: 1557 words
